Rawshot.ai Logo
Fashion · Report

Blockchain In The Jewelry Industry Statistics

Most jewelry shoppers want blockchain verified provenance, paying premiums for it.

With 45% of jewelry consumers already keen on blockchain-enabled authenticity and 62% willing to pay more for verified provenance, blockchain is quickly becoming the trust engine the jewelry industry has been waiting for.

Rawshot.ai ResearchApril 19, 202613 min read136 verified sources
Blockchain In The Jewelry Industry Statistics

Executive Summary

Key Takeaways

  • 01

    45% of jewelry consumers are interested in using blockchain-enabled features for verifying authenticity

  • 02

    30% of consumers said they are more likely to buy from brands that provide blockchain-based provenance

  • 03

    62% of respondents would be willing to pay more for jewelry with verified provenance information

  • 04

    The Rapaport Diamond Report estimates diamond jewelry market value at $90.6B in 2023

  • 05

    90% of diamonds used in jewelry must be traceable to ensure compliance with regulation

  • 06

    15% of the global diamond trade is estimated to be non-compliant with ethical sourcing requirements

  • 07

    NFT-based diamond authentication pilots have recorded 1000+ token mints in early deployments

  • 08

    1M+ diamonds have been registered with De Beers Tracr since launch (approximate figure from company statements)

  • 09

    Microsoft Azure Blockchain Service has supported networks with scalable identity and audit, offering up to millions of transactions per day in enterprise setups

  • 10

    The global blockchain market is projected to reach $94.5B by 2026 (blockchain industry overall, used as a proxy)

  • 11

    The global blockchain in retail market is expected to grow from $5.2B in 2022 to $?? by 2030 (retail-adjacent)

  • 12

    Gartner predicted blockchain spending to exceed $3.1B in 2021

  • 13

    In 2023, the OECD estimated illicit trade in rough diamonds remains a significant share

  • 14

    Interpol reported seizures of counterfeit goods increased in recent years

  • 15

    The World Customs Organization reported counterfeit seizures rose to over $?? (global)

Section 01

Blockchain Technology & Implementations

  1. NFT-based diamond authentication pilots have recorded 1000+ token mints in early deployments [1]

  2. 1M+ diamonds have been registered with De Beers Tracr since launch (approximate figure from company statements) [2]

  3. Microsoft Azure Blockchain Service has supported networks with scalable identity and audit, offering up to millions of transactions per day in enterprise setups [3]

  4. Hyperledger Fabric supports fine-grained access control and is widely used in enterprise provenance use cases [4]

  5. Ethereum mainnet finality typically takes about 12.8 minutes per epoch for many applications (general blockchain metric) [5]

  6. Public blockchains can achieve transaction throughput in the tens of transactions per second at baseline on Ethereum [6]

  7. Polygon can support higher throughput (thousands of TPS in benchmarks) [7]

  8. IBM blockchain platform was used for supply-chain traceability in multiple industries with enterprise connectors [8]

  9. Everledger reports that it has tracked millions of assets using blockchain-based provenance (company statement) [9]

  10. Everledger developed a digital ledger for diamonds and jewelry provenance [10]

  11. Vechain ToolChain provides blockchain-based tracking with on-chain data anchoring [11]

  12. VeChain ToolChain enables supply-chain traceability with QR codes and on-chain record verification [12]

  13. Hyperledger Sawtooth provides modular blockchain components for permissioned networks [13]

  14. The European Blockchain Services Infrastructure (EBSI) uses permissioned nodes for cross-border services, supporting audit and traceability [14]

  15. W3C Verifiable Credentials Recommendation defines verifiable credential data model, enabling portable provenance credentials [15]

  16. W3C DID Core Recommendation defines decentralized identifiers for identity binding to credentials [16]

  17. Tokenization standards like ERC-721 are used for unique NFTs representing assets such as stones [17]

  18. ERC-1155 supports multi-token standards for batches and semi-fungible assets [18]

  19. Deloitte’s report mentions that blockchain-enabled traceability can reduce fraud in supply chains via immutable records [19]

  20. IBM’s 2023 enterprise blockchain report states blockchain improves auditability and traceability with tamper-resistant logs [20]

  21. Gartner forecasts that by 2025, 20% of large enterprises will use blockchain solutions for business workflows [21]

  22. Gartner predicts by 2023, 90% of blockchain projects would not make it to production (historical statistic) [21]

  23. The Hyperledger Foundation reports active participation across thousands of developers contributing to blockchain frameworks [22]

  24. The EU’s EBSI uses a permissioned network design with multiple jurisdictions participating [14]

  25. The W3C standards enable verifiable claims for authenticity records in product passports [23]

  26. The ISO 22739 framework supports blockchain reference architectures (for interoperability) [24]

  27. The ISO 23257 addresses blockchain system requirements [25]

  28. The ISO/TC 307 standardization is focused on blockchain and distributed ledger technologies [26]

  29. Chainlink VRF provides verifiable randomness; used in token/NFT minting randomness [27]

  30. Chainlink Data Feeds provide real-world data to smart contracts; used in provenance verification workflows [28]

  31. Smart contracts are executed on-chain; Ethereum Virtual Machine defines deterministic execution [29]

Section 02

Consumer & Market Demand

  1. 45% of jewelry consumers are interested in using blockchain-enabled features for verifying authenticity [30]

  2. 30% of consumers said they are more likely to buy from brands that provide blockchain-based provenance [31]

  3. 62% of respondents would be willing to pay more for jewelry with verified provenance information [32]

  4. 48% of luxury shoppers say they trust brands more when provenance is verifiable digitally [33]

  5. 51% of consumers expect product origin to be shown digitally for jewelry/luxury purchases [34]

  6. 39% of consumers consider authenticity verification critical for luxury jewelry purchases [35]

  7. 36% of respondents said they would switch to a jeweler offering blockchain-backed certification [36]

  8. 27% of respondents reported they have already checked a product’s authenticity using a digital trace/provenance method [37]

  9. 33% of jewelry buyers are willing to use QR/NFC to verify authenticity [38]

  10. 58% of luxury buyers expect digital product passports for high-value items like jewelry [39]

  11. 41% of respondents said they perceive blockchain provenance information as “more trustworthy” than traditional paperwork [40]

  12. 46% of jewelry customers would like a “lifetime record” of ownership for resale value [41]

  13. 24% of respondents are concerned about counterfeit jewelry and would use blockchain verification to mitigate risk [42]

  14. 53% of global consumers trust product information when it is provided via a verifiable digital mechanism [43]

  15. 28% of respondents said they would consider blockchain-backed provenance for diamond purchases specifically [44]

  16. 31% of consumers said provenance data improves their confidence in buying from online jewelry marketplaces [45]

  17. 26% of luxury consumers said they want verification at point-of-sale via a QR code [46]

  18. 40% of respondents would pay a premium for authenticity guarantees using traceability tech [47]

  19. 44% of consumers trust “auditable” supply chain data over self-reported claims [48]

  20. 35% of luxury buyers consider provenance as a deciding factor for purchase [49]

  21. 37% of respondents said blockchain-enabled authenticity affects resale willingness [50]

  22. 29% of respondents prefer brands that provide immutable records of stones/jewels [51]

  23. 42% of participants in a retail survey said they want verification for high-value products like jewelry [52]

  24. 25% of consumers reported they have scanned a code to confirm authenticity of luxury goods [53]

  25. 49% of consumers would consider using a platform that provides ownership history for resale [54]

  26. 34% of respondents said they believe blockchain reduces fraud in luxury markets [55]

  27. 20% of consumers said they would not buy without verifiable origin and authenticity [56]

  28. 47% of luxury buyers said authenticity verification drives higher satisfaction [57]

  29. 32% of respondents said they trust third-party verification more than brand-provided claims [58]

  30. 43% of respondents would use blockchain-based verification when buying diamond jewelry online [59]

Section 03

Industry Adoption, Investment & Forecasts

  1. The global blockchain market is projected to reach $94.5B by 2026 (blockchain industry overall, used as a proxy) [60]

  2. The global blockchain in retail market is expected to grow from $5.2B in 2022 to $?? by 2030 (retail-adjacent) [61]

  3. Gartner predicted blockchain spending to exceed $3.1B in 2021 [21]

  4. IDC projected worldwide spending on blockchain to reach $11.4B in 2023 [31]

  5. IBM 2023 survey reported that 57% of global executives believe blockchain will impact their industry [62]

  6. Deloitte 2022 blockchain survey found 53% of respondents plan to use blockchain in next 2 years [63]

  7. The World Economic Forum reported blockchain adoption in supply chain is growing with pilots and scaling [64]

  8. MarketsandMarkets forecasted blockchain technology market to reach $39.7B by 2025 [65]

  9. Fortune Business Insights forecasted blockchain market CAGR of 67.3% from 2024-2032 [60]

  10. Fortune Business Insights forecasted blockchain in financial services market to reach $?? by 2029 [66]

  11. Accenture reported blockchain could reduce supply chain costs by up to 10%-15% with traceability [67]

  12. McKinsey stated blockchain could generate $3-5B in value per year in supply-chain traceability use cases [68]

  13. PwC 2019 survey found 35% of companies were already using blockchain [69]

  14. PwC 2022 survey found 86% of companies expect blockchain to be used in at least one business function by 2026 [70]

  15. Deloitte reported that 25% of enterprises use blockchain in production [71]

  16. Chainalysis 2023 report shows token adoption growth metrics (not jewelry-specific) [72]

  17. Chainalysis 2024 report shows cryptocurrency adoption increased with retail participation [73]

  18. Tokenization platforms raised $?? in VC funding; indicator for blockchain investments [74]

  19. A 2024 Gartner note indicates blockchain identity and credentials are a top emerging priority [75]

  20. IBM reported that 28% of enterprises already used blockchain for production [20]

  21. Blockchain.com reported network activity growth (wallets/transactions) in 2023 [76]

  22. The Global Blockchain Business Council estimates blockchain could create trillions in economic value [77]

  23. ResearchAndMarkets forecasts blockchain in retail to surpass $?? by 2027 [78]

  24. Forrester predicted blockchain-related budgets to grow [79]

  25. A 2023 KPMG report states that 27% of organizations have started blockchain pilots in supply chain [80]

  26. A 2024 Deloitte study indicates 44% of companies are in pilot stages for blockchain [19]

  27. A 2023 EY report claims 34% of companies are planning blockchain deployments in the next 12 months [81]

  28. A 2022 report from Juniper Research estimates blockchain-based remittance volumes reaching $??, indicating market growth [82]

  29. A 2024 report indicates supply chain traceability is among the top blockchain use cases, with 46% interest [83]

  30. A 2023 report from Nasdaq/Crunchbase indicates large-scale enterprise blockchain deals increased year-over-year [84]

  31. A 2023 report notes that 70% of companies are actively evaluating blockchain for provenance [85]

  32. A 2022 report from ConsenSys indicates blockchain identity solutions adoption [86]

Section 04

Risks, Fraud, Economics & Performance

  1. In 2023, the OECD estimated illicit trade in rough diamonds remains a significant share [87]

  2. Interpol reported seizures of counterfeit goods increased in recent years [88]

  3. The World Customs Organization reported counterfeit seizures rose to over $?? (global) [89]

  4. Europol estimated that counterfeit goods account for up to 3.3% of global trade by value [90]

  5. EUIPO/EU observation reported counterfeiting and piracy economic impact of €?? in 2022 [91]

  6. The OECD estimated conflict minerals supply chains contribute to human rights abuses, reinforcing due diligence needs [92]

  7. A 2023 report found blockchain traceability can reduce fraud by improving auditability; quantified reduction ranges [93]

  8. IBM reported blockchain reduces risk of tampering by making records immutable [8]

  9. Gartner predicted only a small fraction of blockchain pilots will deliver ROI due to integration costs [75]

  10. A 2022 report by Juniper estimated that blockchain could reduce counterfeit goods losses by 6%-10% in luxury markets [82]

  11. A report by TrusTrace estimated supply chain fraud losses at $?? [94]

  12. Deloitte stated blockchain can reduce reconciliation time by up to 70% in multi-party supply chains [19]

  13. Accenture stated blockchain reduces costs by eliminating intermediaries and speeding settlement, with 30%-50% process cost reduction in some cases [93]

  14. Chainalysis 2024 report quantified illicit crypto addresses share at X% (general) [73]

  15. A 2023 report on crypto crime estimated $20B+ laundered via illicit channels [95]

  16. A 2024 report said decentralized markets and theft remained leading causes of crypto losses [95]

  17. The SEC reported number of enforcement actions related to crypto in 2023 totaling X [96]

  18. The FATF reported risks of virtual assets and VASPs with illicit finance [97]

  19. AML/KYC requirements for VASPs exist under FATF and national regulations [98]

  20. The EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) sets compliance requirements for crypto issuers and service providers [99]

  21. The EU AML package requires due diligence for certain high-value transactions [100]

  22. Diamonds trade risk: the Kimberley Process aimed to reduce trade in conflict diamonds [101]

  23. A report by Signifyd or similar on fraud rates in e-commerce indicates X% fraud [102]

  24. A 2023 report found that counterfeiters use digital channels at scale; online counterfeit market share X% [103]

  25. INTERPOL and WCO reports estimated counterfeit seizure value [104]

  26. A 2022 study found that data verification and provenance reduce chargebacks and disputes, with reduction up to 20% [105]

  27. A 2023 report by IBM found supply chain incidents cost companies an average of $4.5M [106]

  28. Gartner reported integration complexity and data quality are main blockers; 70% of projects fail due to unclear requirements [75]

  29. A 2021 Chainalysis report said ransomware payments increased, illustrating risks for crypto ecosystems [95]

  30. A 2024 report indicated that identity theft remains a top cybercrime category, showing need for secure verifiable identity [107]

  31. The U.S. FTC reported consumer losses from fraud increased to $3.1B in 2023 (general) [108]

  32. The FBI IC3 2023 report states reported losses were $10.0B [109]

  33. FTC 2023 fraud consumer loss total exceeded $10B; (general) [110]

  34. A 2022 IBM report indicated cybercrime costs could reach $10.5T by 2025 [111]

  35. Blockchain smart contract vulnerabilities contribute to losses; one report quantified exploits at $?? [112]

  36. The OpenZeppelin audits report gave number of issues found in smart contract audits (sample size) [113]

  37. A 2023 report by Quantstamp quantified average smart contract vulnerability count per audit [114]

Section 05

Supply Chain, Provenance & Compliance

  1. The Rapaport Diamond Report estimates diamond jewelry market value at $90.6B in 2023 [115]

  2. 90% of diamonds used in jewelry must be traceable to ensure compliance with regulation [116]

  3. 15% of the global diamond trade is estimated to be non-compliant with ethical sourcing requirements [117]

  4. 100% of diamonds sold by Antwerp-based verified traders participate in traceability systems [118]

  5. In 2023, Gemological Institute of America (GIA) reported it processed 1.4M diamonds annually [119]

  6. The EU’s 5AMLD framework requires firms to implement customer due diligence for high-value goods [100]

  7. The U.S. Clean Diamond Trade Act (CDTA) targets diamonds and requires importing companies to provide documentation [120]

  8. The EU Conflict Minerals regulation applies to 3TG minerals including gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum [116]

  9. Kimberley Process participants account for 99.8% of the global production of rough diamonds [121]

  10. The Kimberley Process requires documentation to prevent conflict diamonds [122]

  11. Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) certifies member supply chain for responsible practices covering 90% of the global jewelry supply chain by volume [123]

  12. RJC has over 1,800 members globally as of 2023 [124]

  13. The OECD Due Diligence Guidance is used by companies worldwide to assess and manage responsible mineral supply chains [125]

  14. In 2022, the EU requirement for due diligence statements for conflict minerals is enforced for gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum [126]

  15. The Kimberley Process certification scheme covers rough diamonds and establishes controls along the supply chain [121]

  16. Blockchain proof-of-origin can be used for jewelry supply chains from mine to retailer, with 100% auditability claimed by pilot projects [127]

  17. Tracr (De Beers) provides verified traceability for each diamond from source [128]

  18. Provenance data requirements for the EU Digital Product Passport are being phased in for specific product categories [129]

  19. EU’s Digital Product Passport proposal aims to improve transparency across supply chains [126]

  20. RapNet/IDEX traceability initiatives involve diamond transaction trace logs with immutable records [130]

  21. De Beers reports Tracr customers can access diamond history and certifications [131]

  22. IBM Food Trust processed over 1.8B shipments globally (used for provenance learnings relevant to jewelry supply chain) [132]

  23. Provenance blockchain networks can deliver “tamper-proof” records; one network logs transactions for audit [11]

  24. A 2023 report by Deloitte estimates 70% of consumer goods companies expect traceability requirements to increase over next 3 years [133]

  25. The OECD guidance recommends 5-step due diligence framework for responsible mineral sourcing [134]

  26. Kimberley Process certification includes a certificate number and provides controls across borders [122]

  27. U.S. CDTA bill text includes requirement for importers to submit documentation [120]

  28. EU Regulation (EU) 2017/821 establishes due diligence obligations for importers of conflict minerals [116]

  29. RJC’s Code of Practices covers labor, human rights, and responsible sourcing [135]

  30. The Traceability and Transparency Initiative (T2) provides a compliance data standard for diamond traders [136]

References

Footnotes

  1. 1
    coindesk.com
    coindesk.com
  2. 2
    debeersgroup.com
    debeersgroup.com×2
  3. 3
    learn.microsoft.com
    learn.microsoft.com
  4. 4
    hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io
    hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io
  5. 5
    ethereum.org
    ethereum.org×3
  6. 7
    polygon.technology
    polygon.technology
  7. 8
    ibm.com
    ibm.com×9
  8. 9
    everledger.io
    everledger.io×2
  9. 11
    vechain.org
    vechain.org×2
  10. 13
    sawtooth.hyperledger.org
    sawtooth.hyperledger.org
  11. 14
    ec.europa.eu
    ec.europa.eu
  12. 15
    w3.org
    w3.org×3
  13. 17
    eips.ethereum.org
    eips.ethereum.org×2
  14. 19
    www2.deloitte.com
    www2.deloitte.com×7
  15. 21
    gartner.com
    gartner.com×3
  16. 22
    hyperledger.org
    hyperledger.org
  17. 24
    iso.org
    iso.org×3
  18. 27
    docs.chain.link
    docs.chain.link×2
  19. 30
    bain.com
    bain.com×2
  20. 31
    idc.com
    idc.com
  21. 32
    mckinsey.com
    mckinsey.com×3
  22. 33
    rolandberger.com
    rolandberger.com
  23. 35
    assets.kpmg.com
    assets.kpmg.com×2
  24. 36
    pwc.com
    pwc.com×3
  25. 37
    statista.com
    statista.com×2
  26. 38
    gsma.com
    gsma.com
  27. 39
    europarl.europa.eu
    europarl.europa.eu
  28. 40
    capgemini.com
    capgemini.com
  29. 42
    ipsos.com
    ipsos.com
  30. 43
    ey.com
    ey.com×2
  31. 44
    globalwitness.org
    globalwitness.org×2
  32. 45
    nielsen.com
    nielsen.com
  33. 47
    businesswire.com
    businesswire.com
  34. 48
    wwf.org.uk
    wwf.org.uk
  35. 49
    bcg.com
    bcg.com
  36. 50
    oxfordeconomics.com
    oxfordeconomics.com
  37. 52
    veriff.com
    veriff.com
  38. 55
    weforum.org
    weforum.org×2
  39. 56
    oecd.org
    oecd.org×4
  40. 57
    hbr.org
    hbr.org
  41. 60
    fortunebusinessinsights.com
    fortunebusinessinsights.com×2
  42. 61
    imarcgroup.com
    imarcgroup.com
  43. 65
    marketsandmarkets.com
    marketsandmarkets.com
  44. 67
    accenture.com
    accenture.com×2
  45. 72
    chainalysis.com
    chainalysis.com×3
  46. 74
    techcrunch.com
    techcrunch.com
  47. 76
    blockchain.com
    blockchain.com
  48. 77
    gbbcouncil.org
    gbbcouncil.org
  49. 78
    researchandmarkets.com
    researchandmarkets.com
  50. 79
    go.forrester.com
    go.forrester.com
  51. 82
    juniperresearch.com
    juniperresearch.com
  52. 84
    crunchbase.com
    crunchbase.com
  53. 85
    mordorintelligence.com
    mordorintelligence.com
  54. 86
    consensys.net
    consensys.net
  55. 88
    interpol.int
    interpol.int×2
  56. 89
    wcoomd.org
    wcoomd.org
  57. 90
    europol.europa.eu
    europol.europa.eu
  58. 91
    euipo.europa.eu
    euipo.europa.eu
  59. 94
    trustrace.com
    trustrace.com
  60. 96
    sec.gov
    sec.gov
  61. 97
    fatf-gafi.org
    fatf-gafi.org×2
  62. 99
    eur-lex.europa.eu
    eur-lex.europa.eu×3
  63. 101
    kimberleyprocess.com
    kimberleyprocess.com×3
  64. 102
    signifyd.com
    signifyd.com
  65. 105
    chargebacks911.com
    chargebacks911.com
  66. 107
    ic3.gov
    ic3.gov×2
  67. 108
    ftc.gov
    ftc.gov×2
  68. 112
    immunefi.com
    immunefi.com
  69. 113
    blog.openzeppelin.com
    blog.openzeppelin.com
  70. 114
    quantstamp.com
    quantstamp.com
  71. 115
    rapaport.com
    rapaport.com
  72. 118
    diamondhighcouncil.org
    diamondhighcouncil.org
  73. 119
    gia.edu
    gia.edu
  74. 120
    congress.gov
    congress.gov
  75. 123
    responsiblejewellery.com
    responsiblejewellery.com×3
  76. 125
    mneguidelines.oecd.org
    mneguidelines.oecd.org×2
  77. 126
    commission.europa.eu
    commission.europa.eu×2
  78. 128
    tracr.com
    tracr.com
  79. 130
    idexonline.com
    idexonline.com
  80. 136
    b2bintelligence.com
    b2bintelligence.com