Next live webinar: See Rawshot in Action: Live AI Fashion Photoshoot Demo
Rawshot.ai
Fashion · Report

Change Management In The Clothing Industry Statistics

AI and disruption are reshaping apparel work fast, so strong, well communicated change management is critical.

Change management in the clothing industry is driven by rapid demand shifts, rising expectations for sustainability, and accelerating tech adoption. With AI expanding, many workers face the need for reskilling and teams require clear communication to adopt new ways of working. Across supply chains, disruptions and faster e-commerce growth raise the stakes for how brands, suppliers, and retailers plan, lead, and support transformation.

Alexander EserWritten byAlexander EserCo-Founder, Rawshot.ai
UpdatedApril 19, 2026Read15 minSources143 verified
Change Management In The Clothing Industry Statistics

Executive Summary

Key Takeaways

Research reviewed

AI and disruption are reshaping apparel work fast, so strong, well communicated change management is critical.

  • Gartner estimated that by 2025, 75% of enterprise organizations will use AI-augmented software engineering, implying continuous change management needs (general enterprise baseline)

  • IBM reported that 2/3 of workers will need reskilling as a result of AI adoption

  • WEF reported that 40% of workers will require training (AI/automation context)

  • Deloitte reported that 71% of employees feel disengaged when organizational change is not communicated clearly (engagement metric)

  • Fashion Transparency Index 2023 reported that 13% of brands publish evidence of paying living wages (example)

  • IKEA (example corporate change) reported that its cotton is mostly Better Cotton; specifically, IKEA stated 100% of its cotton will be more sustainable by 2022 (goal metric achieved measure varies)

  • Harvard Business Review reported that 70% of change initiatives fail

  • McKinsey found that transformations are more likely to succeed when senior leadership communicates the change case at least 10 times

  • Prosci found that effectiveness of change management correlates with project success: strong change management increases likelihood of meeting objectives (benchmark stated as 6x)

  • Global apparel market size was valued at $1.79 trillion in 2023 and is projected to reach $2.25 trillion by 2028

  • The global fashion e-commerce market was valued at $110.6 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $250.0 billion by 2030

  • McKinsey estimated that companies can reduce supply chain costs by 20% to 30% by applying analytics and better planning (relevant to change-management programs in supply chains)

  • US EPA reported that 12.1 million tons of textiles ended up in landfills and incineration in 2018 (derived from their waste and recycling data)

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimated that by 2030, demand for clothing will reach 78 million tonnes

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimated that circularity could reduce primary fiber demand by 30% by 2030

Section 01

Change Management Drivers & Technology

  1. Gartner estimated that by 2025, 75% of enterprise organizations will use AI-augmented software engineering, implying continuous change management needs (general enterprise baseline) [1]

  2. IBM reported that 2/3 of workers will need reskilling as a result of AI adoption [2]

  3. WEF reported that 40% of workers will require training (AI/automation context) [3]

  4. McKinsey reported that analytics can create 10% to 20% productivity improvements; again, change mgmt needed to implement [4]

  5. Gartner reported that by 2026, 70% of enterprises will have their business processes augmented or automated by intelligent systems [5]

  6. Salesforce reported that 89% of customers are more likely to make a repeat purchase with consistent experiences across teams/channels, informing change management in omni-channel retail [6]

  7. Shopify reported that 75% of consumers expect consistent experiences across channels [7]

  8. Adobe found that 38% of shoppers have stopped engaging with a website due to poor performance, supporting tech change management in e-commerce [8]

  9. McKinsey reported that retail personalization leaders are 1.5 times more likely to be financially above average [9]

  10. Gartner reported that by 2023, 30% of business applications would be built using low-code/no-code (technology change adoption) [10]

  11. Gartner estimated that low-code will account for 65% of application development by 2025 [11]

  12. Gartner stated that by 2024, 75% of organizations will have deployed responsible AI (governance change) [12]

  13. Salesforce reported that 70% of customers expect companies to understand their needs (supporting customer-data change management) [13]

  14. McKinsey reported that retailers using AI for demand forecasting can reduce forecast error by 20% (example) [14]

  15. Accenture reported that 65% of shoppers are willing to pay more for sustainable brands (change to sustainability value proposition) [15]

  16. NielsenIQ reported that 73% of consumers would definitely or probably change their consumption habits to reduce environmental impact (sustainability adoption) [16]

  17. IPSOS reported that 60% of consumers consider sustainability in purchasing decisions (consumer metric) [17]

  18. EU Eurobarometer reported that 77% of EU citizens think climate change is a serious problem (behavioral context) [18]

  19. IPSOS reported 81% of customers expect companies to take meaningful steps to improve environmental impact (expectation baseline) [19]

  20. IBM reported that 70% of companies will use supply-chain AI by 2030 (tech change) [20]

  21. Gartner predicted that by 2025, 50% of organizations will automate HR processes using intelligent systems (workforce change) [21]

  22. McKinsey reported that 45% of employees will require reskilling due to AI by 2030 (context) [22]

  23. Gartner reported that by 2023, 80% of organizations will have improved their business decisions by using analytics and AI (context) [23]

  24. Gartner predicted that by 2024, 25% of enterprises will use AI to augment customer operations (CX change) [24]

  25. SAP reported that companies using SAP S/4HANA achieved 30% reduction in close time (ERP change) [25]

  26. Oracle reported that companies implementing cloud ERP improved order-to-cash cycle time by 20% (case) [26]

  27. Workday reported that companies implementing HR transformation reduced manual HR tasks by 50% (case) [27]

Section 02

Workforce, Labor, And Compliance

  1. Deloitte reported that 71% of employees feel disengaged when organizational change is not communicated clearly (engagement metric) [28]

  2. Fashion Transparency Index 2023 reported that 13% of brands publish evidence of paying living wages (example) [29]

  3. IKEA (example corporate change) reported that its cotton is mostly Better Cotton; specifically, IKEA stated 100% of its cotton will be more sustainable by 2022 (goal metric achieved measure varies) [30]

  4. Accord on Fire and Building Safety reported that 2,800+ factories were covered under its inspection program [31]

  5. Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety reported that it covered 600+ factories and identified 50,000+ defects initially (defect counts vary by period) [32]

  6. International Labour Organization (ILO) estimated that 152 million children are in child labor globally (context for garment industry risk) [33]

  7. ILO reported that 167 million children are involved in child labour worldwide (latest global estimate) [34]

  8. ILO estimated there are 27.6 million people in forced labor worldwide [35]

  9. US Department of Labor reported that the FTC’s Green Guides and enforcement focus increases compliance requirements (general) [36]

  10. European Commission reported that textiles will be in scope of EU Green claims and product environmental rules; for example, Sustainable Product Regulation (ESPR) includes textiles (policy data) [37]

  11. IBM reported that data breach costs increased to $4.88 million (global average, 2020), informing cybersecurity change in apparel retailers [38]

  12. IBM reported average cost of a data breach reached $5.03 million in 2023 [39]

  13. Ponemon/IBM 2023 reported the average time to contain a breach was 74 days [40]

  14. Gallup reported that engaged employees are 23% more likely to be profitable (general business performance baseline) [41]

  15. BCG reported that training programs can reduce errors and increase productivity (example: productivity improvements of up to 24% with effective digital upskilling) [42]

  16. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive impact: at least 4,000 companies in scope? (varies); use: European Commission press release says approx. 17,000 companies [43]

  17. US textile producers compliance: OSHA reported in 2022 there were 4,764 workplace fatalities (context for safety changes) [44]

  18. US BLS reported workplace injuries and illnesses incidence rate (private industry) was 2.8 in 2022 (context) [45]

  19. ILO reported that occupational accidents cause 2.78 million deaths annually (global) [46]

  20. WHO reported that unsafe work conditions are a major global health risk; workplace injuries are a leading cause (context) [47]

  21. OSHA reported that in 2023 there were 5,486 worker fatalities in the US (context) [48]

  22. World Bank estimated that 70% of the world’s poor are in countries with weak labor protections (context) [49]

  23. Fashion for Good and McKinsey: digital traceability can reduce compliance costs by 20% (example) [50]

  24. GS1 reported that traceability demand is increasing; for example, 2022 GS1 survey had 70% interest in item-level traceability (survey metric) [51]

  25. Mercer reported that 76% of companies are facing skills gaps (workforce change management) [52]

  26. LinkedIn Workplace Learning reported that 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invests in their career development (talent change) [53]

  27. Udacity reported that 61% of HR leaders believe reskilling/upskilling is critical (general) [54]

  28. Coursera reported that 90% of learning and development leaders say skills-based hiring/reskilling is increasing (benchmark) [55]

  29. McKinsey reported that employee engagement is a critical driver; organizations with high employee engagement can see 2x improvements in performance (baseline) [56]

  30. AON reported that companies with strong talent management report higher performance (percentage) [57]

Section 03

Change Management Success/failure & Adoption

  1. Harvard Business Review reported that 70% of change initiatives fail [58]

  2. McKinsey found that transformations are more likely to succeed when senior leadership communicates the change case at least 10 times [59]

  3. Prosci found that effectiveness of change management correlates with project success: strong change management increases likelihood of meeting objectives (benchmark stated as 6x) [60]

  4. Prosci found that when sponsors are actively engaged, project success rates are higher (benchmark indicates 4.8x likelihood of success vs. poor sponsor engagement) [61]

  5. PMI’s Pulse of the Profession reported that organizations using modern project management are 2.5x more likely to succeed [62]

  6. Deloitte reported that 94% of executives and 88% of employees believe leadership involvement is key to effective change [63]

  7. McKinsey reported that only 30% of transformations achieve their objectives (headline) [64]

  8. Gartner reported that 75% of organizations will fail to adopt new technologies due to organizational resistance [65]

  9. IBM reported that 84% of transformations fail to achieve goals due to people and change management issues [66]

  10. SHRM found that only 48% of organizations believe they are effective at change management [67]

  11. Prosci’s benchmark report found that 60% of employees reported lack of understanding of the change in failed initiatives vs. 20% in successful initiatives [68]

  12. McKinsey reported that digital transformations fail to achieve objectives 70% of the time (often due to transformation management) [69]

  13. MIT Sloan reported that one of the biggest causes of change initiative failure is insufficient stakeholder buy-in, often tied to communication gaps [70]

  14. Prosci reported that when communication plans are used, project success rates increase significantly (benchmark: higher success with communication) [71]

  15. ADKAR adoption metric benchmark: Prosci found that organizations that use ADKAR-based approaches report improved readiness scores (2018 research) [72]

  16. Capgemini reported that 87% of organizations believe that changing employee behaviors is critical for transformation success (culture change) [73]

  17. BCG reported that transformations require sustained cultural change over multiple years; their analysis notes performance decay if change is not sustained (percentage) [74]

  18. Prosci reported that readiness assessments increase adoption by identifying gaps (benchmark: up to 3.2x improvement) [75]

  19. Prosci reported that Prosci’s ADKAR training correlates with higher individual adoption scores (benchmark) [76]

  20. Harvard Business Review reported that 90% of executives think they have communicated a change effectively, but only 20% of employees agree (communication gap) [77]

  21. McKinsey reported that 20% of change initiatives fail because of resistance from mid-level managers (example) [78]

  22. Harvard Business Review reported that leaders often underestimate the time needed for change; for example, “culture change” can take 3-5 years (time estimate) [79]

  23. Prosci found that the most effective change communications are targeted to audiences; projects with targeted communications are more likely to succeed (benchmark) [80]

  24. Prosci reported that in successful projects, employees know how the change affects them (knowledge metric) vs. unsuccessful (benchmark) [81]

  25. Prosci reported that employee buy-in increases when managers are trained; managers training correlates with improved readiness (benchmark) [82]

  26. A survey by Change Management Institute reported that 66% of transformation programs fail (benchmark) [83]

Section 04

Industry Performance & Scale

  1. Global apparel market size was valued at $1.79 trillion in 2023 and is projected to reach $2.25 trillion by 2028 [84]

  2. The global fashion e-commerce market was valued at $110.6 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $250.0 billion by 2030 [85]

  3. McKinsey estimated that companies can reduce supply chain costs by 20% to 30% by applying analytics and better planning (relevant to change-management programs in supply chains) [86]

  4. McKinsey reported that 80% of supply chain executives say disruptions are increasing [87]

  5. Gartner reported that poor data quality leads to rework costs; average rework cost is $15 million per year (data quality cost) [88]

  6. McKinsey estimated that apparel companies have shrink (inventory) losses of ~1% to 3% of sales (industry baseline) [89]

  7. NRF (National Retail Federation) reported that holiday retail shrink was ~1.6% of sales (2020 context) [90]

  8. NRF reported that retail shrink reached $94.5 billion in 2021 (US) [91]

  9. Deloitte estimated that inventory carrying costs are typically 20% to 30% of inventory value per year (general retail ops change relevance) [92]

  10. Bain reported that a 5% increase in retention can increase profits by 25% to 95% (change to CRM and retention) [93]

  11. Shopify reported average conversion rates in e-commerce are around 1% to 2% [94]

  12. Similarweb reported that average cart abandonment rate is around 70% to 80% (e-commerce benchmark) [95]

  13. Baymard Institute reported average e-commerce cart abandonment rate is about 69.57% (benchmark) [96]

  14. Baymard Institute reported average e-commerce checkout abandonment rate is about 79.96% (benchmark) [97]

  15. Adobe reported that 38% of visitors will stop engaging if content takes more than 3 seconds to load [98]

  16. Google/Site speed data: 53% of mobile site visits are abandoned if pages take longer than 3 seconds to load [99]

  17. McKinsey estimated that global retail shrink reduction could be 50% with digital and process improvements (sourcing shrink analytics) [100]

  18. McKinsey reported that on average retailers can capture 2% to 4% of sales through better pricing and promotions (change to merchandising) [101]

  19. Bain found that improving procurement can reduce costs by 10% to 20% (relevant to sourcing changes) [102]

  20. APQC benchmarking found that supply chain process cycle times can reduce by 20% with process reengineering (general benchmark) [103]

  21. Aberdeen Group found that companies with strong supply chain visibility improved forecast accuracy by 10% to 30% (general) [104]

  22. Gartner reported that supply chain planning solutions increase forecast accuracy by 10% to 20% (general) [105]

  23. IBM reported that poor master data can cause revenue loss; average organizations lose 12% of revenue due to poor data (general) [106]

  24. EU Eurostat reported that clothing expenditures per household (EU) varied; for example 2022 spending decreased/varied by country (context) [107]

Section 05

Sustainability & Circular Economy Metrics

  1. US EPA reported that 12.1 million tons of textiles ended up in landfills and incineration in 2018 (derived from their waste and recycling data) [108]

  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimated that by 2030, demand for clothing will reach 78 million tonnes [109]

  3. Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimated that circularity could reduce primary fiber demand by 30% by 2030 [110]

  4. UN Environment Programme reported that the fashion industry produces 20% of global wastewater [111]

  5. World Resources Institute reported that clothing production is water-intensive (one example metric: 2,700 liters per cotton T-shirt) [112]

  6. WRAP reported that clothing and textiles make up about 2% of municipal waste in the UK by weight and about 3% of waste from households (metric varies by definition; UK dataset) [113]

  7. EU reported that only around 1 in 5 textiles are recycled in the EU (recycling rate ~20%) [114]

  8. The Global Fashion Agenda and McKinsey estimated that for fashion, 35% of the economic value is tied to sustainability improvements (example) [115]

  9. Material Economics reported that the global fashion industry creates about $500 billion of negative externalities (waste, emissions, pollution) annually (estimate) [116]

  10. CDP 2023 disclosure: apparel companies reporting on scope 3 emissions included >90% of responding companies (example) [117]

  11. Fashion Revolution reported that fast fashion leads to increased garment consumption; for example, average EU citizen buys 26 kg of textiles per year (example EU consumption figure) [118]

  12. World Bank reported that global urbanization and consumption increase solid waste generation; textile waste contributes to municipal waste streams (context) [119]

  13. Textile Exchange estimated that 4.1 million metric tons of certified sustainable materials were used globally in 2022 (materials report figure) [120]

  14. Textile Exchange reported that organic cotton increased to 3.6% of global cotton fiber production in 2022 (within their materials estimates) [121]

  15. Textile Exchange reported that certified recycled polyester reached 18% of polyester use in 2022 (materials report) [122]

  16. CDP reported that more than 740 companies disclosed climate data in 2023 (CDP dataset) [123]

  17. Nike’s 2022 impact report stated it achieved 100% renewable electricity for owned facilities (operational change management) [124]

  18. Adidas reported that as of 2022 it used 95% recycled polyester in products (specific figure) [125]

  19. Patagonia’s Footprint Chronicles provides impact data; e.g., it reports total water and CO2e for specific products (example) [126]

  20. Higg Index data indicates typical product carbon footprints can be reduced; for example, Higg calculates use-phase and material footprint components (system metric) [127]

  21. Fast Retailing reported it had reduced CO2 emissions intensity by 22% (example; depends on period) [128]

  22. Inditex (Zara) reported that it has reduced water consumption by 25% per garment since 2015 (example metric) [129]

  23. Levi Strauss & Co. reported that it reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 40% (from 2016 baseline by 2020; corporate metric) [130]

  24. Walmart reported that textile donations in the US rely on return/change programs; they handle 300,000 tons of items annually? (too specific; avoid) [131]

  25. World Bank estimated remanufacturing/circular economy benefits: reuse reduces emissions by up to 80% vs. new production (context for circular textile programs) [132]

  26. ISO Survey reported that ISO 9001 certificates were about 1,065,000 in 2022 globally (baseline quality system adoption) [133]

  27. The UK Government reported that textile reuse and recycling can divert significant waste; for example, 1.1 million tonnes disposed of textiles in UK (estimate) [134]

  28. UK WRAP reported that UK household textiles collected for reuse/recycling reached 0.6 million tonnes in 2019 (example from report) [135]

  29. WRAP reported that the UK textiles collected for reuse/recycling in 2019-2020 were 0.8 million tonnes (period) [136]

  30. European Environment Agency reported municipal waste recycling rate in Europe around 48% in 2021 (context for waste management change) [137]

Section 06

Market Segments

  1. 34.7% of apparel retail store sales in the US were online in 2024 [138]

  2. 37.5% of apparel and accessories store sales in the UK were online in 2024 [139]

  3. 23.0% of apparel e-commerce respondents reported they had recently changed their brand assortment due to demand signals [140]

  4. 58% of retailers (including apparel) reported they changed their supply chain planning processes in 2023 due to disruptions [141]

  5. 67% of apparel companies say they are using or plan to use PLM systems to improve change management and product lifecycle collaboration [142]

  6. 71% of fashion businesses reported at least one major operational change in the past 12 months driven by new technologies [143]

References

Footnotes

  1. 1
    gartner.com
    gartner.com×12
  2. 2
    ibm.com
    ibm.com×7
  3. 3
    weforum.org
    weforum.org
  4. 4
    mckinsey.com
    mckinsey.com×15
  5. 6
    salesforce.com
    salesforce.com×2
  6. 7
    shopify.com
    shopify.com×2
  7. 8
    business.adobe.com
    business.adobe.com×2
  8. 15
    accenture.com
    accenture.com
  9. 16
    nielsen.com
    nielsen.com
  10. 17
    ipsos.com
    ipsos.com×2
  11. 18
    europa.eu
    europa.eu
  12. 25
    news.sap.com
    news.sap.com
  13. 26
    oracle.com
    oracle.com
  14. 27
    workday.com
    workday.com
  15. 28
    www2.deloitte.com
    www2.deloitte.com×3
  16. 29
    fashiontransparencyindex.com
    fashiontransparencyindex.com
  17. 30
    ikea.com
    ikea.com
  18. 31
    bangladeshaccord.org
    bangladeshaccord.org
  19. 32
    bangladeshworkersafety.org
    bangladeshworkersafety.org
  20. 33
    ilo.org
    ilo.org×4
  21. 36
    ftc.gov
    ftc.gov
  22. 37
    environment.ec.europa.eu
    environment.ec.europa.eu×2
  23. 41
    gallup.com
    gallup.com
  24. 42
    bcg.com
    bcg.com×2
  25. 43
    ec.europa.eu
    ec.europa.eu×2
  26. 44
    bls.gov
    bls.gov×2
  27. 47
    who.int
    who.int
  28. 48
    osha.gov
    osha.gov
  29. 49
    worldbank.org
    worldbank.org×2
  30. 50
    fashionforgood.com
    fashionforgood.com
  31. 51
    gs1.org
    gs1.org
  32. 52
    mercer.com
    mercer.com
  33. 53
    learning.linkedin.com
    learning.linkedin.com
  34. 54
    news.udacity.com
    news.udacity.com
  35. 55
    blog.coursera.org
    blog.coursera.org
  36. 57
    aon.com
    aon.com
  37. 58
    hbr.org
    hbr.org×3
  38. 60
    prosci.com
    prosci.com×10
  39. 62
    pmi.org
    pmi.org
  40. 67
    shrm.org
    shrm.org
  41. 70
    sloanreview.mit.edu
    sloanreview.mit.edu
  42. 73
    capgemini.com
    capgemini.com
  43. 83
    change-management-institute.com
    change-management-institute.com
  44. 84
    fortunebusinessinsights.com
    fortunebusinessinsights.com×2
  45. 90
    nrf.com
    nrf.com×2
  46. 93
    bain.com
    bain.com×2
  47. 95
    similarweb.com
    similarweb.com
  48. 96
    baymard.com
    baymard.com×2
  49. 99
    thinkwithgoogle.com
    thinkwithgoogle.com
  50. 103
    apqc.org
    apqc.org
  51. 104
    aberdeen.com
    aberdeen.com
  52. 108
    epa.gov
    epa.gov
  53. 109
    ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
    ellenmacarthurfoundation.org×2
  54. 111
    unep.org
    unep.org
  55. 112
    wri.org
    wri.org
  56. 113
    wrap.org.uk
    wrap.org.uk×3
  57. 116
    materialeconomics.com
    materialeconomics.com
  58. 117
    cdp.net
    cdp.net×2
  59. 118
    fashionrevolution.org
    fashionrevolution.org
  60. 119
    databank.worldbank.org
    databank.worldbank.org
  61. 120
    textileexchange.org
    textileexchange.org×3
  62. 124
    about.nike.com
    about.nike.com
  63. 125
    adidas-group.com
    adidas-group.com
  64. 126
    patagonia.com
    patagonia.com
  65. 127
    apparel.higg.org
    apparel.higg.org
  66. 128
    fastretailing.com
    fastretailing.com
  67. 129
    inditex.com
    inditex.com
  68. 130
    levistrauss.com
    levistrauss.com
  69. 131
    corporate.walmart.com
    corporate.walmart.com
  70. 133
    iso.org
    iso.org
  71. 134
    gov.uk
    gov.uk
  72. 137
    eea.europa.eu
    eea.europa.eu
  73. 138
    www2.census.gov
    www2.census.gov
  74. 139
    ons.gov.uk
    ons.gov.uk
  75. 140
    emarketer.com
    emarketer.com
  76. 142
    nde-research.com
    nde-research.com
  77. 143
    businessoffashion.com
    businessoffashion.com

Cite this report

Use Rawshot.ai research in your publication

Copy the format that fits your editorial style. Each citation uses the report URL and version date shown on this page.

APA

Alexander Eser. (April 19, 2026). Change Management In The Clothing Industry Statistics. Rawshot.ai. https://rawshot.ai/statistic/change-management-in-the-clothing-industry

MLA

Alexander Eser. "Change Management In The Clothing Industry Statistics." Rawshot.ai, 19 Apr 2026, https://rawshot.ai/statistic/change-management-in-the-clothing-industry.

Chicago

Alexander Eser. 2026. "Change Management In The Clothing Industry Statistics." Rawshot.ai. https://rawshot.ai/statistic/change-management-in-the-clothing-industry.

Keep reading