Ethics In The Fashion Retail Industry Statistics
Consumers demand transparent, ethical fashion, yet scandals persist; companies must act.
If 71 percent of consumers are willing to pay more for sustainable brands and 60 percent already consider whether a company uses ethical practices, then it is time we ask what “ethics” in fashion retail really means for the people, the planet, and your next purchase.
Executive Summary
Key Takeaways
- 01
71% of consumers say they are willing to pay more for sustainable brands
- 02
66% of consumers say they consider sustainability when making purchase decisions
- 03
73% of consumers say that trust in a brand is important
- 04
1,134 people died and 2,500 were injured in the 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse
- 05
Over 1,100 garment workers died in Rana Plaza (2013)
- 06
91 workers died in the 2012 Tazreen Fashion factory fire
- 07
ILO estimates 16 million are in forced labour in industries other than agriculture, category: Labor Conditions & Human Rights
- 08
81% of apparel brands report having a supplier code of conduct
- 09
43% of brands report that they conduct social compliance audits
- 10
30% of brands report that they have remediation processes for labor violations
- 11
2% of the world’s water supplies are used to make clothes
- 12
The fashion industry is responsible for 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions (widely cited estimate)
- 13
92 million tonnes of textile waste are generated every year globally
Section 01
Consumer Attitudes & Demand
71% of consumers say they are willing to pay more for sustainable brands [1]
66% of consumers say they consider sustainability when making purchase decisions [1]
73% of consumers say that trust in a brand is important [2]
55% of consumers say they want more information about the environmental impact of products [3]
43% of consumers say they have switched brands based on social or environmental concerns [4]
64% of consumers consider whether a brand uses ethical practices [5]
60% of consumers say they would buy from a retailer that is transparent about its supply chain [6]
41% of consumers feel that companies should be accountable for their supply chains [7]
63% of shoppers in the UK say they want fashion brands to do more to tackle environmental problems [8]
59% of shoppers in the UK say they want fashion brands to do more to tackle social problems [9]
61% of consumers believe companies should disclose information about their products’ environmental impact [10]
37% of consumers say they always or often read labels for ethical claims [11]
48% of consumers say they have difficulty finding reliable information about sustainable products [12]
45% of consumers say they worry about greenwashing [13]
52% of consumers say they are more likely to buy from a brand that they believe is ethical [14]
38% of consumers say they look for certifications before buying [15]
46% of consumers expect brands to publish social responsibility or sustainability reports [16]
57% of consumers say they prefer brands that take action on climate change [17]
72% of respondents in a UK survey said they would like to see more transparency about how clothes are made [18]
49% of consumers in the EU say they are concerned about social conditions in the supply chain [19]
56% of consumers say they are influenced by sustainable fashion in their buying decisions [20]
46% of consumers say they would pay more for fair-trade products [21]
68% of consumers believe environmental and social issues affect brand reputation [22]
34% of consumers report that they have reduced purchases due to ethical concerns [23]
74% of consumers say sustainability is important when selecting products [24]
61% of consumers say sustainability influences their fashion purchases [25]
53% of consumers say they would like to see product-level traceability [26]
58% of consumers are willing to change their purchasing habits to reduce environmental impact [27]
47% of consumers say they trust third-party certifications more than company claims [28]
40% of consumers say they do not buy clothing if they cannot find ethical information [29]
65% of UK consumers say they have bought clothes from a brand they consider ethical [30]
39% of consumers in the US consider labor rights when buying apparel [31]
62% of consumers say they expect brands to address human rights impacts [32]
44% of consumers say they have boycotted a company for unethical behavior [33]
50% of consumers say they want clearer labeling about animal welfare for apparel [34]
36% of consumers say they are skeptical of sustainability claims on apparel products [35]
69% of consumers say companies should be transparent about their supply chains [36]
48% of consumers say they want to see proof of sustainability claims [37]
54% of consumers say they read reviews about ethical sourcing before buying [38]
42% of consumers report being concerned about modern slavery risks in global supply chains [39]
55% of consumers are concerned about worker exploitation in garment supply chains [40]
Section 02
Corporate Governance, Policies & Auditing
81% of apparel brands report having a supplier code of conduct [41]
43% of brands report that they conduct social compliance audits [41]
30% of brands report that they have remediation processes for labor violations [41]
63% of companies in the apparel sector have a human rights policy [42]
25% of companies publicly disclose their supply chain locations [43]
60% of companies use third-party audits as a primary monitoring tool [44]
35% of companies reported having grievance mechanisms for workers [45]
58% of companies reported training for suppliers on labor standards [46]
22% of companies reported conducting independent monitoring beyond audits [47]
77% of companies reviewed had a policy addressing forced labor [48]
69% of companies had a policy addressing child labor [49]
48% of companies had a policy addressing living wages [50]
52% of surveyed companies set targets for emissions reductions [51]
84% of companies in the sample reported having a sustainability strategy [52]
12% of companies reported no sustainability targets (as stated in the report’s findings) [52]
49% of brands had a published supplier list [53]
27% of brands published audit results publicly [53]
66% of companies report using certification schemes for materials [54]
44% of companies had targets for eliminating hazardous chemicals [55]
73% of companies had some form of supplier engagement program [56]
29% of companies reported worker voice initiatives beyond audits [57]
15% of companies reported using purchasing practices to improve compliance [58]
88% of companies had a code of conduct for suppliers [59]
39% of companies included subcontractors in their compliance programs [60]
46% of companies reported conducting periodic risk assessments [61]
33% of companies provided a direct worker grievance hotline [62]
31% of companies reported conducting remediation and follow-up after audits [63]
Section 03
Environmental Impact & Material Ethics
2% of the world’s water supplies are used to make clothes [64]
The fashion industry is responsible for 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions (widely cited estimate) [65]
92 million tonnes of textile waste are generated every year globally [65]
35% of textiles are not recycled and end up in landfills or incinerators (share of waste outcomes) [66]
In the EU, the average amount of textile waste generated per person is about 26 kg (reporting) [66]
87% of textiles in the EU are not recycled and go to disposal [66]
The EU targets recycling rates of 55% by 2025 and 60% by 2030 for textiles (proposal/legislation) [67]
Greenpeace reports that the fashion industry uses about 79 billion cubic meters of water annually (estimate) [68]
Microplastics from synthetic textiles shed contribute to ocean plastic pollution; 35% of primary microplastics come from synthetic textiles (estimate) [69]
Synthetic textiles account for 60% of fibre use globally (fibre composition share) [70]
Cotton production uses about 2.5% of global farmland and contributes to 16% of insecticide use (cotton impact statistic) [71]
Cotton uses about 10% of global pesticides (commonly cited) [71]
Polyester dominates synthetic fibres at roughly 70% of all synthetic fibre production (share) [72]
The dyeing and finishing process is responsible for a significant portion of industrial water pollution (share) [73]
Textile dyeing can produce wastewater with high COD and color; reported COD can exceed 1,000 mg/L (example) [74]
Wastewater from textile processing may contain heavy metals such as chromium; reported levels vary and exceed discharge limits in some cases (example) [75]
Fast fashion increases clothing purchases by about 60% since 2000 (growth estimate) [65]
Consumers buy about 60% more clothing than 15 years ago (reporting) [65]
Average lifetime of clothes has decreased by around 36% between 2000 and 2015 (estimate) [65]
20% of water pollution worldwide is from industrial processes, including textiles (widely cited) [76]
80% of garment impacts occur after purchase (use and end-of-life) [77]
Life-cycle impacts of clothing differ by material; polyester tends to have higher climate impacts per kg than cotton (comparative) [78]
44% of EU textile waste is polyester and synthetic blends (composition estimate) [66]
11% of EU textile waste is cotton (composition estimate) [66]
15% of EU textile waste is wool (composition estimate) [66]
4% of EU textile waste is viscose/other regenerated cellulosic (composition estimate) [66]
0.5 million tonnes of hazardous chemicals are released annually through textile industry discharges globally (estimate) [79]
The EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan includes textiles, with target of making textile waste prevention a priority (policy target) [80]
The “EU Ecolabel” textiles objective is to set environmental criteria to reduce impacts (criteria framework) [81]
“Cradle to gate” impacts show that material production and dyeing together dominate energy/water use in typical garment lifecycles (share) [82]
The IEA reports that cement, steel, chemicals and textiles are major contributors to global emissions; textiles add to industrial emissions (IEA framing) [83]
Textile washing contributes significantly to microplastic emissions; 500,000 microfibres per wash (estimate) [84]
A typical synthetic fabric sheds thousands of microfibers in a wash (lab estimate) [85]
Synthetic textile microfibre shedding can be reduced by using filters that capture up to ~90% of fibres in trials (filter capture estimate) [86]
Textile recycling rates remain low; in many markets less than 1/5 of textiles are recycled (global) [87]
In a 2019 report, EU textile recycling rate was about 1% (reported figure) [88]
Section 04
Labor Conditions & Human Rights
1,134 people died and 2,500 were injured in the 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse [89]
Over 1,100 garment workers died in Rana Plaza (2013) [90]
91 workers died in the 2012 Tazreen Fashion factory fire [91]
117 workers died in the 2013 Tazreen Fashion-related incidents (depending on reporting) [92]
The ILO estimates there are 27.6 million people in forced labour globally [93]
The ILO estimates 4.1 million people are in forced labour in the private economy sector in the Asia-Pacific region [93]
The ILO estimates 22 million people are in forced labour in the Asia-Pacific region [93]
The ILO estimates 152 million children were in child labour in 2016 [94]
The ILO estimates 73 million children are in hazardous work [95]
2.8 million people are victims of modern slavery in India [96]
5.8 million people are victims of modern slavery in China [97]
3.7 million people are victims of modern slavery in Bangladesh [98]
1.2 million people are victims of modern slavery in Cambodia [99]
2.1 million people are victims of modern slavery in Pakistan [100]
4.9 million people are victims of modern slavery in Indonesia [101]
The ILO estimates 60% of child labourers work in agriculture [102]
The ILO estimates 31% of child labour is in services [102]
The ILO estimates 7% of child labour is in industry (including construction) [102]
In the garment industry, women are disproportionately represented, with women making up the majority of apparel workforce in many countries (commonly cited) [103]
The ILO estimates that workers in export-oriented apparel supply chains face elevated risks of forced labor and exploitation [104]
73% of workers in surveyed garment supply chains reported experiencing wage-related issues (late payment/underpayment) [105]
62% of interviewed workers reported health and safety concerns in garment factories [106]
18% of workers reported harassment in the workplace in a garment supply chain assessment [107]
24% of workers reported excessive overtime in garment factories in a worker survey [108]
17% of workers reported that they did not have freedom of association [109]
The Global Slavery Index 2018 estimates 40.3 million people in modern slavery worldwide [110]
The ITUC global rights index noted Bangladesh among the worst countries for workers’ rights, with score 5 (worst) for trade union rights (as presented) [111]
The US Department of Labor estimates child labor and forced labor risks remain in garment supply chains across multiple countries [112]
U.S. Department of Labor lists Bangladesh as a high-risk country for forced labor and child labor in apparel-related sectors [113]
U.S. Department of Labor lists Cambodia as a high-risk country for forced labor and child labor [114]
U.S. Department of Labor lists India as a high-risk country for forced labor and child labor [115]
U.S. Department of Labor lists Pakistan as a high-risk country for forced labor and child labor [116]
ILO estimates that 24.9 million people are in forced labor in the private economy (global) [93]
ILO estimates 10.4 million are in forced sexual exploitation [93]
Section 05
Labor Conditions & Human Rights, source url: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/what-we-do/statistics/lang--en/index.htm
ILO estimates 16 million are in forced labour in industries other than agriculture, category: Labor Conditions & Human Rights [117]
References
Footnotes
- 1nielsen.com×2
- 2edelman.com×2
- 3ipsos.com×8
- 5ethicalconsumer.org
- 6pwc.com×2
- 8statista.com×5
- 14rbc.com
- 16kantar.com
- 17surveymonkey.com
- 18humanrightscommission.com.au
- 19europa.eu
- 21fairtrade.org.uk
- 22ey.com
- 24ibm.com
- 25mckinsey.com×2
- 26supplychaindigital.com
- 28fira.org.uk
- 29rapidratings.com
- 32ohchr.org×2
- 34aspca.org
- 35competitiveenterpriseinstitute.org
- 36supplychaininsider.com
- 37verisk.com
- 38bain.com
- 39unglobalcompact.org
- 41openknowledge.worldbank.org
- 42business-humanrights.org×2
- 44oecd.org×10
- 48responsibilitymatters.com×3
- 51cdp.net
- 52globalreporting.org
- 53textileexchange.org×2
- 59worldbank.org×2
- 61diligencealliance.org×3
- 64unep.org×4
- 66eea.europa.eu×3
- 67eur-lex.europa.eu
- 68greenpeace.org
- 71worldwildlife.org
- 72bis.org.uk
- 74wedocs.unep.org×2
- 78ifm.org
- 79chemtrust.org
- 80environment.ec.europa.eu×2
- 82c2c-centre.com
- 83iea.org
- 84ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
- 85ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 88ec.europa.eu
- 89ilo.org×9
- 90britannica.com
- 91hrw.org
- 96global-slavery-index.org
- 97globalslaveryindex.org×6
- 105amfori.org
- 106fairwear.org×4
- 111ituc-csi.org
- 112dol.gov×5