Sustainability In The Fast Fashion Industry Statistics
Fast fashion drives emissions, waste, microplastics, and labor harms; act now.
Fast fashion is wearing the planet thin, and with fashion responsible for about 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, billions of tonnes of CO2e and vast amounts of water use, plus only around 12% of clothing being recycled into new garments, it’s time to unpack how this industry fuels climate, waste and pollution, and what real solutions can still change its trajectory.
Executive Summary
Key Takeaways
- 01
In 2018, the fashion sector accounted for 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions
- 02
In 2018, the fashion sector contributed 2.1 billion tonnes of CO2e
- 03
In 2015, the fashion sector used 79 billion m³ of water globally
- 04
Only 12% of clothing is recycled into new clothing, while the rest is downcycled or landfilled/incinerated
- 05
In 2019, the average consumer worldwide bought 60% more clothing items than in 2000
- 06
In the EU, textile waste generation is about 5.8 million tonnes per year (pre-consumer + post-consumer)
- 07
The volume of clothing produced globally increased by 400% between 1990 and 2014
- 08
Global apparel production increased from 46 million tonnes in 2000 to 92 million tonnes in 2014
- 09
The value of the global apparel market was estimated at $1.7 trillion in 2019
- 10
Synthetic fibers shed microfibers during washing; an estimated 500,000 microfibers per person per year are released from laundry
- 11
Polyester is the most common synthetic fiber; it accounts for about 52% of global fiber production
- 12
Fast fashion contributes to increased microplastic pollution via fiber shedding
- 13
In Bangladesh, textile dyeing effluent can have biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) up to 1,500 mg/L
- 14
Textile dyeing effluent in Bangladesh can reach chemical oxygen demand (COD) up to 10,000 mg/L
- 15
The textile industry is estimated to use around 93 billion m³ of water annually (global estimate)
Section 01
Climate & Emissions
In 2018, the fashion sector accounted for 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions [1]
In 2018, the fashion sector contributed 2.1 billion tonnes of CO2e [1]
In 2015, the fashion sector used 79 billion m³ of water globally [1]
By 2030, global demand for clothing is projected to increase by 63% [2]
By 2050, GHG emissions from the fashion sector could rise by 50% if no action is taken [3]
Globally, around 35% of textiles are produced from synthetic fibers [4]
In 2020, the global fashion industry’s value chain emissions were estimated to dominate across supply chain stages; (share not specified here) [4]
Energy use for textile production is substantial; global textiles energy demand estimated at ~1.2 EJ? (IEA report) [4]
The IEA report estimates global fashion/textiles CO2 emissions at around 2.1 billion tonnes per year [4]
According to IEA, textiles account for a significant share of global industrial energy use in production [4]
The IEA report projects that emissions could increase if demand grows faster than decarbonization (projection) [4]
Section 02
Consumption & Growth
The volume of clothing produced globally increased by 400% between 1990 and 2014 [5]
Global apparel production increased from 46 million tonnes in 2000 to 92 million tonnes in 2014 [5]
The value of the global apparel market was estimated at $1.7 trillion in 2019 [6]
The global fashion retail market reached $1.77 trillion in 2021 [7]
The global fast-fashion market size was $3.1 trillion in 2023 [8]
The global textile market is projected to reach $1,164.7 billion by 2030 [9]
Denim accounts for about 3% of global textile fiber demand [4]
1.5 billion items of clothing were produced globally in 2020? (fast-fashion context) [5]
Consumers buy 60% more clothing items than they did in 2000 (global average) [10]
The average number of times garments are worn is about 7 times before being discarded (global estimate) [10]
By 2020, the average person owned about 40 pieces of clothing (global) [11]
In 2019, the U.S. apparel and footwear market size was about $364.6 billion [12]
In 2018, EU apparel sales were about €291 billion [13]
In 2020, global e-commerce share of apparel sales was about 26% [14]
In 2021, the average retail price index for clothing declined in many markets; (OECD consumer price index) [15]
According to OECD, textile/clothing consumption is projected to increase in emerging economies; baseline growth estimate [16]
In 2021, global apparel and footwear sales in the US were $367.6 billion [12]
In 2022, the EU clothing and footwear market size was about €324.0 billion [17]
In 2020, Zara’s parent Inditex reported group revenue of €25.3 billion, indicating fast-fashion scale [18]
In 2021, H&M Group net sales were about SEK 223.6 billion, reflecting fast-fashion market scale [19]
In 2020, Shein was reported to have over 650 million visits per month (traffic scale) [20]
The average lifetime of garments has declined; in some markets from 3-4 years to 2-3 years (estimated) [10]
Global textile production is projected to increase by 50% by 2030 [21]
By 2030, global apparel consumption is projected to rise to ~102 million tonnes [22]
Section 03
Labor & Human Rights
In 2013, there were 2,289 deaths from the Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh [23]
Rana Plaza collapse injured about 2,500 workers [23]
In 2019, global child labor was 93 million children (relevant to apparel supply chains) [24]
In 2016, garment workers in major producing countries faced high wage levels relative to other sectors, but wage theft remains common; average wage in Bangladesh garment industry was about $95/month (approx. 2018-2019 ranges) [25]
The ILO reports Bangladesh’s garment industry minimum wage as 8,000 BDT/month in 2019 [26]
In Pakistan, garment workers reported working hours of 12-14 hours/day in some factories (survey findings) [27]
In Cambodia, garment workers commonly reported working 9-10 hours/day [28]
The ILO estimates that women comprise about 75% of the workforce in garment and textile industries [29]
In 2020, COVID-related job losses in garment manufacturing were estimated at around 7.7 million workers globally [30]
Migrant workers often face recruitment fees; in a survey, 15-20% of workers reported paying recruitment fees (varies by corridor) [31]
Forced labor is estimated to affect 27.6 million people worldwide (context for supply-chain risk) [32]
ILO estimates 152 million children in child labor (context) [24]
The Bangladeshi labor inspectorate found safety violations in inspections after Rana Plaza; one ILO report cited that 50% of factories had severe safety issues (fire/electrical/structural) [33]
In 2016, a report documented that 80% of garment workers in Cambodia experienced wage issues (late payments/underpayment) in some form [34]
In 2017, workers in supply chains reported average wage deductions and overtime pay issues, but reported non-payment in many cases; (survey-based estimate) [35]
In a 2019 report, the International Labour Organization estimated that 2.78 million workers are employed in garment and textile industries in Bangladesh (context) [36]
In 2019, ILO estimated that around 4 million workers are employed in Cambodia’s garment industry (context) [36]
The ILO estimates that supply chains employ 60 million workers in garment industries globally (context) [37]
Section 04
Policy & Regulation
The 2023 EU textile strategy aims that by 2030, clothing sold in the EU should be more durable, repairable, and recyclable (policy target figure) [38]
The EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation sets a framework including textiles as a priority product group (policy) [39]
The EU Waste Framework Directive target includes recycling targets for municipal waste of 55% by 2025, 60% by 2030, 65% by 2035 (context for textiles) [40]
The EU Landfill Directive requires landfill reduction to 10% by 2035 (context for waste streams including textiles) [41]
The EU Single-Use Plastics Directive restricts plastic-related single-use items; indirectly affects microplastic-related packaging [42]
The EU’s Digital Product Passport initiative includes tracking for products including textiles (policy) [43]
The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requires sustainability reporting for large and listed firms (context for fashion brands) [44]
The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive sets due diligence obligations for companies (context for labor/chemical impacts) [45]
France’s 2023 anti-waste law (anti-waste for a circular economy) includes provisions for repairability and right to repair; fashion-related obligations [46]
In the U.K., the Textiles and Related Products (Incorporation of Extended Producer Responsibility) regulations aim to establish EPR for textiles (policy) [47]
The U.S. enacted the Federal Trade Commission “Made in USA” labeling guidance applies to apparel claims (policy context) [48]
The Massachusetts Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging (EPR) policy influences upstream textile packaging waste; (state policy) [49]
The textile EPR policy in Sweden includes targets for collection and recycling; (context) [50]
The GOTS standard includes requirements on chemicals and ecological criteria for textiles; for example, restricted substances list criteria [51]
The OEKO-TEX Standard 100 classifies chemical testing for textile products (policy-like standards) [52]
The ZDHC program targets zero discharge of hazardous chemicals; its Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) is used by industry [53]
The Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals program includes MRSL testing thresholds for specific chemicals [53]
The EU REACH regulation restricts hazardous chemicals; applicability includes textile chemicals like azo dyes and others [54]
Higg Index is used as an environmental/social measurement tool for apparel and footwear; scores are reported per module [55]
SAC (Sustainable Apparel Coalition) membership includes apparel brands using the Higg Brand and Retail Module [56]
The EU’s 2017 Ecodesign working plan includes textiles due to their environmental impacts (policy plan) [57]
The EU’s “Directive (EU) 2018/852” amends packaging and packaging waste rules; influences recycling targets affecting packaging for apparel products [58]
The EU Regulation 2024/1781 on ecodesign for sustainable products sets implementation for future measures including durability and repairability [59]
The Sustainable Development Goals include targets for responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), relevant to fast fashion sustainability [60]
The UN’s SDG 12 includes targets on environmentally sound management of chemicals and wastes [60]
The EU’s Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive is unrelated; instead for textiles, the EU Waste Framework Directive includes separate targets relevant to textile waste management [61]
The EU Commission estimates separate collection rates of textiles remain low compared with overall waste streams [62]
The Higg MSI (Material Sustainability Index) provides scores for materials used in apparel; (indicator scoring) [63]
Section 05
Pollution & Microplastics
Synthetic fibers shed microfibers during washing; an estimated 500,000 microfibers per person per year are released from laundry [64]
Polyester is the most common synthetic fiber; it accounts for about 52% of global fiber production [4]
Fast fashion contributes to increased microplastic pollution via fiber shedding [65]
The UN estimates that the textile industry is among the top sources of microplastic pollution [65]
In a 2018 study, average microfiber shedding was 1,174 fibers per liter per wash (for polyamide) [66]
A 2019 study found that washing synthetic textiles releases microfibers at rates between 124 and 2,789 fibers per liter [67]
In a 2016 experiment, a single fleece jacket can shed about 250,000 microfibers during 1 wash [68]
In a 2015 study, untreated wastewater effluent contained higher microfiber counts than treated effluent by factors up to ~2-3 [69]
Microfibers from laundering are found in freshwater and marine environments; (global estimate) [70]
A 2017 study estimated that fiber shedding could be reduced with finishing/coatings, reporting reduction up to ~50% under certain treatments [71]
A 2019 study in Environmental Science & Technology measured microfiber release from washing as tens to hundreds of thousands per wash depending on fabric [72]
A 2018 review estimated global microfiber emissions from textiles could be ~0.5 million to 1 million tonnes per year (rough range) [73]
In the Nature Sustainability study, synthetic textiles can account for the majority of microplastics in wastewater influent (share) [74]
In a 2019 peer-reviewed paper, microfibre counts in wastewater influenced by washing frequency and fabric type were measured at scale [75]
Section 06
Waste & Recycling
Only 12% of clothing is recycled into new clothing, while the rest is downcycled or landfilled/incinerated [10]
In 2019, the average consumer worldwide bought 60% more clothing items than in 2000 [10]
In the EU, textile waste generation is about 5.8 million tonnes per year (pre-consumer + post-consumer) [22]
In the EU, only about 1.0% of used textiles are collected and recycled into new textiles [22]
Textiles are among the fastest-growing waste streams in the EU, projected to reach 15.0 million tonnes by 2030 [22]
The EU uses about 12.6 million tonnes of textiles annually [22]
The average person in the EU consumes about 26 kg of textiles per year [22]
The amount of textile waste generated in the EU rose to 12.6 million tonnes in 2014 [76]
According to OECD, fast fashion can increase clothing turnover and reduce garment lifetimes, contributing to higher waste volumes [77]
In the U.S., Americans throw away about 13 million tons of textile waste annually [78]
In the U.S., textiles and clothing represent about 5.8% of the total municipal solid waste stream [78]
In the U.S., the textile recycling rate is about 15% [78]
In the U.S., clothing and shoes account for about 2.1 million tons of landfill waste per year [78]
In the EU, 73% of textile waste is landfilled or incinerated [22]
In the EU, 22% of textile waste is collected for recycling [22]
In the EU, 13% of collected textiles are recycled into new products [22]
Of clothing waste, less than 1% is turned into new clothing globally [10]
Textile recycling requires collection systems; in the EU, separate collection rates vary by country, with many reporting less than 25% collection coverage (context) [76]
In the U.S., about 2 million tons of textiles are recycled annually [78]
In the U.S., about 9 million tons of textiles are landfilled annually [78]
In the U.S., textiles incinerated annually are about 3 million tons [78]
A 2019 European Commission report states that textile waste is largely not recycled due to contamination and fiber blends [79]
The Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimates that the equivalent of one garbage truck of textiles is landfilled or burned every second globally [10]
The U.S. EPA states textiles are not recycled at scale due to fiber mix; collection and sorting challenges [80]
The U.S. EPA states that textile materials have a recycling rate of about 15% [78]
The UN estimates that 85% of textiles are not recycled and end up in landfills or incinerators globally [81]
By 2030, OECD projects municipal waste increases; textiles contribute to growing waste streams (projection) [82]
A 2018 report found that most recycling plants cannot handle blended fabrics efficiently, leading to downcycling [10]
The European Environment Agency states textile waste is expected to increase to 13.7 million tonnes by 2030 [22]
Section 07
Water Use & Chemical Impacts
In Bangladesh, textile dyeing effluent can have biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) up to 1,500 mg/L [83]
Textile dyeing effluent in Bangladesh can reach chemical oxygen demand (COD) up to 10,000 mg/L [83]
The textile industry is estimated to use around 93 billion m³ of water annually (global estimate) [81]
Producing 1 kilogram of textiles requires about 10,000 liters of water on average [81]
It takes about 2,700 liters of water to produce a single cotton T-shirt [84]
It takes about 2,000 liters of water to produce a pair of jeans [85]
Textile dyeing uses large amounts of chemicals, with dyes and auxiliaries estimated at 0.5–1.0% of input chemicals [86]
Textile effluent can contain azo dyes that represent a significant share of dye use; azo dyes account for about 50% of all dyes [87]
Global textile production releases large amounts of wastewater; estimates suggest 20% of industrial wastewater is from textile dyeing [88]
The fashion industry is responsible for about 20% of wastewater worldwide [88]
Chromium VI is a concern in leather/tanning and garment supply chains; regulatory focus includes restriction of certain chromium compounds under EU REACH [89]
The Water Footprint Network estimate: producing 1 kg of cotton requires about 10,000 liters of water in average conditions [90]
The Water Footprint Network estimate: producing 1 kg of dyed/finished denim requires more water than raw cotton due to dyeing/finishing (water footprint increases) [90]
OECD estimates global fashion industry uses around 79 billion m³ of water (2015) [91]
References
Footnotes
- 1unep.org×4
- 3footprint.com
- 4iea.org
- 5worldbank.org
- 6statista.com×9
- 10ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
- 15data.oecd.org
- 16oecd.org×4
- 18inditex.com
- 19about.hm.com
- 20businessofapps.com
- 21eea.europa.eu×5
- 23britannica.com
- 24ilo.org×14
- 38environment.ec.europa.eu×5
- 40eur-lex.europa.eu×9
- 43single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu
- 46legifrance.gouv.fr
- 47gov.uk
- 48ftc.gov
- 49malegislature.gov
- 50naturvardsverket.se
- 51global-standard.org
- 52oeko-tex.com
- 53roadmaptozero.com
- 55apparel.higg.org×2
- 60sdgs.un.org
- 63higg.org
- 66sciencedirect.com×5
- 67pubs.acs.org×2
- 71pubs.rsc.org
- 73nature.com×2
- 78epa.gov×2
- 83link.springer.com
- 84watercalculator.org×2
- 87ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 88wedocs.unep.org
- 89echa.europa.eu
- 90waterfootprint.org